We have a new name! Browserbear is now Roborabbit

Browser Automation: Code or Nocode?

When choosing between a code or nocode-based web automation approach, the decision depends on your specific requirements, technical expertise, and long-term goals. This guide explores some considerations to keep in mind.
by Julianne Youngberg ·

Contents

    Browser automation has existed for nearly as long as web browsers themselves. As web development advanced, developers recognized the need to reduce the manual effort required for cross-browser and multi-device testing. Selenium and WebDriver were the first solutions introduced to address this need, and they later merged to become a standard that’s still used to:

    • Test web applications
    • Validate cross-browser compatibility
    • Scrape data from websites
    • Perform repetitive web-based tasks
    • Simulate user interactions
    • And more!

    Over the years, a wide range of automation solutions have emerged, each addressing different needs. Developers now have access to a variety of JavaScript libraries to choose from. Additionally, low-code and no-code solutions have been introduced as a faster and more accessible way to perform browser actions.

    When choosing a browser automation solution, you’ll have to consider key factors like scalability, implementation time, and pricing. Evaluating these things against your requirements will help you decide whether a code-based or no-code solution is more suitable. This guide will help you explore these factors and select the option that best fits your needs.

    Exploring Your Web Automation Use Case

    Choosing the right web automation tool starts with understanding your specific use case. With so many solutions available, each offering different features and price points, evaluating your needs will help you narrow down the options and make an informed decision.

    As you explore your web automation use case and decide whether you want a code-based solution or no- or low-code tool, consider the following:

    Complexity

    Automation use cases can range from simple, repetitive tasks, while others are advanced, multi-step workflows involving multiple applications. Assessing the complexity of your needs can help you decide whether you can build on top of a pre-existing template or if it’s better to start from scratch.

    Features & Capabilities

    Are there any specific capabilities required for your use case? If your focus is on web scraping, Octoparse may be the ideal solution. For web application testing, the Cypress framework is often preferred. If you have a wider range of automation needs, a more comprehensive solution like Roborabbit, which offers a variety of actions and integrations, could be an excellent choice.

    Technical Expertise

    Assessing your team’s technical skills and resources is crucial when selecting an automation solution. Code-based libraries like Selenium require a high level of technical proficiency to set up and maintain. In contrast, nocode solutions are more accessible for non-technical users.

    Scale & Performance

    High-volume, high-frequency use cases may need more scalable and powerful solutions compared to smaller-scale automation tasks. Depending on your specific requirements, you might find that launching instances from your local machine is better suited than executing on the cloud, or vice versa. Clearly defining your use case will help you assess the scalability and performance requirements of your solution.

    Cost

    Pricing for automation solutions varies widely. Some are free, while others use a subscription model or charge based on usage. The pricing also scales differently across solutions. Free browser automation libraries may only incur labor costs, which can be expensive for small-scale needs but efficient at scale. Conversely, pay-as-you-go solutions may be cost-effective for small, repetitive tasks, but become very expensive at higher frequencies.

    Understanding your web automation use case is crucial in determining whether a code-based or a no-code solution is more suitable. Now, let's explore the key characteristics of these two categories to help you make an informed decision.

    Hare Hint 🐰: Rarely are no-code browser control solutions truly code-free. While you can get many automation tasks up and running with no technical knowledge, you can still benefit from some coding know-how to troubleshoot and maintain your tasks.

    Code-based Browser Automation Solutions

    For organizations and teams who require a high degree of flexibility and customization in their browser automation efforts, code-based solutions are often preferred. These solutions typically involve using a dedicated library or framework that allows you to programmatically control and interact with web browsers.

    Some of the key advantages of a code solution include:

    • Tailored Functionality : Creating your own solution means you can build workflows that are precisely aligned with your requirements, without having to be limited to pre-defined templates or actions.
    • End-to-end Integration : Browser control libraries can integrate their functionality with existing applications, databases, and other systems, allowing you to create end-to-end automation processes.
    • Scalability : Code-based solutions provide greater control over configuration, versions, and environments. Some also allow you to choose whether you would like to manage browser actions locally or on the cloud. This flexibility makes it easier to handle increasing volumes of tasks and concurrent browser instances as your needs grow.

    While there are many use cases where code-based browser automation is ideal, the advantages come with a tradeoff. Building from scratch requires more technical expertise, and the learning curve can be steep. The amount of labor that goes into a small, repetitive task may not be worth the price, either.

    A few examples of code-based solutions are:

    • Selenium WebDriver : An open-source API and protocol that controls web browser actions both locally or on a remote machine using the Selenium server
    • Playwright : An open-source automation library for browser testing and web scraping on Chromium, Firefox and WebKit
    • Cypress : A JavaScript library that helps developers write, run, and debug tests for web applications
    • Puppeteer : A Node.js library that enables browser control for headless Chrome or Chromium browsers using a high-level API

    These libraries are open-source and free to use.

    Code-based web automation solutions are best suited for complex use cases, particularly those involving other applications and databases. However, building these solutions requires technical resources—either an experienced developer on the team or the budget to hire one.

    Hare Hint 🐰: If you've decided on a code-based solution but are still starting out on your coding journey, the next step is to decide on a language. Our Python vs. JavaScript guide may help you out!

    Nocode Browser Automation Solutions

    Nocode browser automation tools are highly accessible to non-technical users. These tools often have visual interfaces, allowing users to create workflows through web apps, desktop apps, or browser extensions. Additionally, some tools offer pre-built solutions for specific use cases, which can significantly speed up the implementation process.

    Some of the key advantages of a nocode solution are:

    • Accessibility and Ease of Use : Nocode tools are designed to be intuitive, with a relatively shallow learning curve. They are accessible to a broader range of users, not just analysts and developers.
    • Rapid Implementation : With pre-built templates, actions, and integrations for common use cases, many users find nocode tools to significantly reduce the time and effort required to deploy a solution.
    • Reduced Maintenance : Service providers are responsible for maintaining the underlying infrastructure, which can be especially helpful for teams without dedicated DevOps or automation engineering teams.
    • Collaboration : Some nocode tools have collaboration features such as shared workspaces, version control, and access management. This can make it easier for teams to work together on web automation projects.

    Nocode web automation tools are much more approachable to non-technical users, and they’re often preferred when teams are working with less resources. It’s important to note, however, that they may have limitations in terms of customization, advanced functionality, and scalability compared to code-based approaches.

    A few examples of nocode web automation tools are:

    • Axiom : A Chrome extension to automate website actions and repetitive tasks
    • Octoparse : A desktop app focused on scraping structured data without code
    • Roborabbit : A web app with an intuitive workflow builder to automate a wide range of browser actions

    These solutions are at different price points, each with features that may be better suited to one use case than another.

    Nocode browser automation tools excel when the focus is on simplicity, rapid implementation, and accessibility for non-technical users. Intuitive builders can help you quickly set up tasks like data entry, form filling, and web scraping. Organizations or individuals without dedicated DevOps teams may find these platforms to be better as they don’t require extensive programming expertise.

    However, the ease of use with nocode comes with trade-offs in flexibility and scalability. While effective for many common automation needs, these platforms may prove limiting for complex, multi-step processes that require deep integration with other applications or databases.

    Conclusion

    When choosing a browser automation approach, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. The decision ultimately depends on your specific requirements, technical expertise, and long-term goals. Code-based frameworks offer more flexibility and customization, making them well-suited for complex, integrated workflows. On the other hand, no-code tools excel in simplicity and accessibility, allowing non-technical users to quickly automate common web-based tasks.

    By carefully evaluating your use case and weighing the trade-offs, you can select the browser automation solution that best aligns with your needs and resources. Whether you opt for a code-based or no-code solution, the right tool can unlock significant efficiencies and enhance your web automation efforts.

    Roborabbit is a user-friendly robotic process automation (RPA) tool that simplifies browser automation. Its intuitive builder, integration options, and pre-built templates enable you to get your first task up and running in minutes. Start a free trial today!

    About the authorJulianne Youngberg@paradoxicaljul
    Julianne is a technical content specialist fascinated with digital tools and how they can optimize our lives. She enjoys bridging product-user gaps using the power of words.

    Automate & Scale
    Your Web Scraping

    Roborabbit helps you get the data you need to run your business, with our nocode task builder and integrations

    Browser Automation: Code or Nocode?
    Browser Automation: Code or Nocode?